Z

MD5 vs SHA-256

MD5 vs SHA-256 compared — hash length, speed, collision resistance and security, plus free hash generators for both.

MD5 and SHA-256 are both hash functions, but they are not interchangeable: MD5 is fast and short (128-bit) but cryptographically broken, while SHA-256 (256-bit, part of SHA-2) is the modern secure standard.

MD5 vs SHA-256 at a glance

MD5 SHA-256
Output length 128-bit (32 hex) 256-bit (64 hex)
Speed Faster Slower (acceptable)
Collision resistance Broken (collisions known) Strong
Security use Not safe Recommended
Good for Non-security checksums Integrity, signatures, passwords (with salt+KDF)

When to use MD5

Use MD5 only for non-security checksums — quick deduplication or detecting accidental corruption. Never use it for passwords, signatures or anything an attacker could target.

When to use SHA-256

Use SHA-256 for anything security-related: file integrity, digital signatures, and (with a salt and a proper KDF like bcrypt/argon2) password storage.

Tools for MD5 & SHA-256

MD5 vs SHA-256

Is MD5 still safe to use?

Not for security. Practical collision attacks exist, so MD5 must not be used for signatures, certificates or passwords. It is fine only for non-adversarial checksums like detecting accidental file corruption.

Is SHA-256 enough for passwords?

A raw SHA-256 is too fast for password storage. Use a salt and a dedicated password KDF (bcrypt, scrypt or argon2). SHA-256 itself is correct for file integrity and signatures.